FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
BOND REFERENDUM BASICS
What is a school bond referendum and what role could it play in MTPS building improvements?
A bond referendum is a vote in which a school district seeks permission to borrow funds through the sale of bonds to make long-lasting improvements. Property taxes are used to buy back those bonds, with interest.
School districts leverage this funding tool for several reasons, and a key advantage is access to state aid. Through a voter-approved bond referendum, the district is eligible for state aid to cover part of the project costs, reducing the amount required from local property taxes.
How does a bond referendum fit into MTPS’ long-term maintenance and improvement plans?
The Moorestown Board of Education has invested in safety and security, technology, facility maintenance, and more over the years. However, some of our building needs are beyond routine maintenance. For example, it’s becoming more and more difficult to repair and maintain our outdated HVAC systems.
A professional review of facilities and a community survey both pointed to the need for additional improvements to meet priorities of keeping class sizes small, advancing instructional programming, and positioning the district to expand early childhood education in the future.
Learn even more through this short video that features Interim Superintendent Mr. Bollendorf explaining how funding long-term projects through a referendum takes stress off the annual operating budget.
Why fund large-scale projects through a bond referendum instead of the annual budget?
Schools periodically need building improvements that would put a significant strain on the annual operating budget. Moving those must-do projects into a bond-funded budget qualifies them for state aid that is only available through a voter-approved bond referendum.
Go to the 1:38 mark to hear from Interim Superintendent Mr. Bollendorf on how this would open a key opportunity to get state funding not available through other means.
How would spreading costs over time help meet needs sooner?
MTPS has a pressing need to create more space for our current elementary population and expand programming in our schools. A voter-approved bond referendum would provide up-front funding to complete all projects within a few years but would spread payments over the useful life of the improvements. This timeline would manage costs while ensuring our buildings are best suited to serve our students and community. It would also offer a realistic path to fund capital projects that simply can’t be addressed within the regular operating budget, which must prioritize the day-to-day costs of running our schools.
Why does MTPS believe it is the right time to hold a bond referendum?
Older HVAC systems and roofs are ready for replacement, space is insufficient for current and future students, and athletic areas are due for improvement, among other issues. Interim Superintendent Mr. Bollendorf explains how now is the right time in this short video.
Other timely factors include:
Although improvements would better prepare our schools for enrollment growth, we need more space now. Elementary class sizes are above optimal levels, and some are at capacity, meaning students have to attend schools other than the ones in their neighborhood.
Previous school debt will soon be paid off, which would mitigate the tax impact as we seek to make a new investment in the schools.
Some of the equipment we use to heat and cool our schools is severely outdated and expensive to operate. That includes boilers from the 1980s and air conditioners requiring refrigerant that’s increasingly hard to find. New equipment would be more energy- and cost-efficient.
How did the district approach this proposal differently than the 2019 referendum?
District leaders and board members thoroughly evaluated how to revise the bond proposal that voters rejected in 2019.
We listened to the community, and incorporated data and feedback into the process. More than 1,000 residents provided input through a community-wide survey.
The previous proposal would have added four classrooms onto each side of WAMS. The new plan would add more space and separate students by grade level.
The new referendum addresses current needs for athletic areas, including updates to Isenberg Gym and the tennis courts at the high school, plus a full-size middle school gym addition that would be available for community use
More HVAC equipment is now in need of replacement. By making energy-efficient upgrades through a referendum, state aid would cover one-third of the costs.
This proposal takes a big-picture approach to site work, particularly the need for traffic enhancement
What financial factors are more favorable now than they were in 2019?
MTPS will pay off debt on previous projects in 2029, which will help mitigate the tax impact of financing new improvements.
Additionally, the new proposal includes much more HVAC work than the previous referendum. By funding such projects through a referendum, rather than through the regular budget, the district will receive state funding to cover a third of the cost, offsetting taxpayers’ share.
PROJECT FOCUS
What criteria were used to select the projects included in the proposal?
Working with professional consultants, MTPS carefully considered improvements that would meet the district’s most pressing facilities needs. Many of the upgrades are eligible for state aid that would reduce taxpayers’ share of the project costs.
These projects cannot be effectively addressed through the annual operating budget, which must cover the day-to-day costs of running district schools.
What building projects are proposed, and how would they improve our schools?
The updates fall into four general categories:
Expanding and upgrading space for students: Proposed improvements include revamping Upper Elementary School (UES) into a true elementary school with a third-grade wing; expanding William Allen Middle School to include sixth grade and separate students by grade level; moving transportation operations out of Moorestown High School (MHS) to create space for innovative programming; and enhancing and adding athletic facilities.
Addressing aging systems and infrastructure: Proposed improvements include roof replacement, HVAC and boiler upgrades; masonry restoration and waterproofing.
Enhancing safety and security: Proposed improvements include public-address and fire alarm system replacements; fencing, drainage and playground upgrades; and security upgrades that would enhance the effectiveness of locking down building spaces.
Improving campus parking and traffic flow: Proposed improvements, designed in conjunction with traffic consultants, include moving the bus depot, adding parking capacity and modifying driveways to enhance safety and reduce congestion.
How would the proposed improvements enhance elementary education in our district?
Renovations at UES would create a welcoming new environment for third-graders in a dedicated elementary school setting.
The third-grade shift would open space at Baker, South Valley and Roberts elementary schools, allowing us to reduce class sizes. First and second grades are currently capped at 25 students per class – higher than the optimal number of 22 or lower. When all classes at a grade level are at capacity, students can’t attend their neighborhood schools, and must be bused to another school.
Go to the 0:40 mark to hear Superintendent Mr. Bollendorf explain the importance of having students attend their neighborhood schools.
What academic enhancements/courses would be added through the projects at MHS and WAMS?
At MHS, moving the transportation department and buildings and grounds staff would free up space for instruction. Updated areas could accommodate in-demand programs such as STEM, robotics and wood and metal shop class. The district is also working to bring cutting-edge AI (artificial intelligence) programming to the high school.
Renovations at the middle school would create small-group instruction space and enhance physical education areas. Sixth-graders would move from Upper Elementary School to an expanded middle school, joining their peers for a more optimal learning experience.
Overall, the additional space provides flexibility that will let us be responsive to students’ evolving instructional needs.
What happens if the referendum does not pass?
If the referendum fails, the district will have no immediate path to meet its building needs.
Without the state aid that comes with an approved referendum, any individual projects would have to be paid for entirely through local taxes. Such an approach would allow piecemeal work at best over a longer period of time.
How would providing full-day kindergarten benefit our district now?
MTPS is among a handful of school districts in the state that don’t offer tuition-free, full-day kindergarten. Students can attend half days at no charge, but full-day kindergarten is only available for families who pay tuition. Adding a tuition-free program would ensure that all families could benefit, regardless of economic status.
Go to the 1:30 mark to hear Interim Superintendent Mr. Bollendorf explain more on how having this program would provide a variety of benefits for our children.
The need for additional kindergarten staffing would be minimal; we expect to accommodate all students by adding another classroom in each of the three lower elementary buildings.
How could adding full-day kindergarten lead to tuition-free pre-K down the road?
Providing tuition-free, full-day kindergarten would position the district to consider expanding elementary education in the future. A free, full-day kindergarten program would make the district eligible to apply for the state preschool expansion grant. The grant would cover annual staffing and operating costs for a pre-k program, but the district must provide free, full-day kindergarten to be eligible.
Go to the 0:50 mark to hear Interim Superintendent Mr. Bollendorf explain more on how this expansion could be possible in the future.
How can the play/outdoor area at UES be preserved if the bus depot moves to the property?
A pole barn, or utility building, would be built in a tucked-away area behind UES. The design would include extensive traffic management measures, including separate routes for buses and parent drop-off and pick-up; re-routing of bike and walking paths; and security and visibility enhancements. A tree line would provide a visual buffer.
The fenced-in play area would be upgraded with accessible equipment to ensure children with mobility issues can participate.
How is the proposed bus depot move to UES part of an overall plan to improve traffic flow and safety around school buildings?
Moving the district’s bus depot to a less intrusive area behind UES would create the opportunity for a more effective traffic layout at WAMS/MHS.
The plan would widen entrances to move traffic off surrounding roadways and expand student parking at the high school.
At the middle school, changes in the bus loop and student drop-off driveway would create more efficient traffic flow.
Over at UES, traffic design would separate the flow of parent and bus traffic. The driveway would be widened to accommodate two-way bus traffic directly onto Borton Landing Road.
How could the bus depot move to UES without causing rush-hour gridlock?
The UES grounds can better handle the flow of bus traffic than the congested lot at the high school. Widening the UES driveway to accommodate buses coming in and out also would keep traffic moving.
Bus travel would occur at off-peak hours, with drivers leaving around 6:15 a.m. for the morning routes and returning mid-morning, and departing for pickup mid-afternoon, returning a few hours later. This schedule would not overlap with parent drop-off and pickup times.
How would the district ensure a smooth transition of the bus depot to the UES neighborhood?
About 75 percent of the district’s fleet of 40 school buses run on gasoline, which is quieter than diesel. With school buses replaced at the rate of 2 to 3 a year, nearly all of the buses would be gas-operated by the time the depot would shift to UES.
The bus depot would be in a tucked-away area of the campus. A tree line would provide a visual buffer.
The proposal also calls for enhanced safety on walking routes near the school.
How would the investment in moving the bus depot help expand instructional opportunities?
The estimated $3.84 million expense of moving bus operations to an area better able to handle the traffic is a fraction of the total referendum cost.
Shifting the buses from the high school to UES would dramatically improve parking availability and traffic flow at the high school, as well as the adjacent middle school.
The proposal to remove the indoor bus maintenance garage from the high school would improve air quality and free up space for programming. Renovations could create space for in-demand programs such as STEM, robotics and wood and metal shop class.
FUNDING DETAILS
How does a voter-approved bond referendum ensure improvements are not funded solely through property taxes?
The New Jersey Department of Education uses revenue collected from across the state to help fund school district building improvements. Districts only receive these funds if they pass a bond referendum.
School districts often use this funding strategy for large-scale projects that could not realistically be completed through the operating budget. That regular budget relies almost entirely on property taxes to cover day-to-day operations.
The state aid and estimated tax impact will be known after the Department of Education completes its review of our proposed projects. The information will be posted on this website once it is available.
Can we access the state dollars for these projects without a referendum?
The state only provides funding for eligible building projects through a voter-approved bond referendum.
Your tax dollars already contribute to the state revenue that funds school improvements across New Jersey, but only a voter-approved bond referendum will bring some of that money back to the Moorestown community.
The state is currently reviewing the district’s proposed improvements to determine the amount of aid. That information, and the finalized project list and estimated total cost, will be shared on this website once it is available.
Why does the district believe additional staffing needs would be minimal?
We propose moving third grade to UES and sixth grade to WAMS. In both cases, teachers would simply move with their grade levels, requiring minimal or no additional staffing.
The third-grade shift, along with renovations, would free up four classrooms at each of the three lower elementary schools. Some of that space would be used to reduce class sizes – and could require more teachers.
Expanding to tuition-free, full-day kindergarten, for example, would use one of the additional classrooms – and add a teacher – at each of the three lower elementary schools.
We are also committed to expanding tech-based programming and opportunities for small-group instruction at the middle and high schools. This change would create more courses, but could be managed with existing staff.
Addressing building improvements through a voter-approved referendum would secure state aid, plus it would reserve the annual budget for its primary purpose: staffing, operations and other day-to-day expenses.
WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT VOTING
Who can vote in a bond referendum?
Voters must be U.S. citizens, at least 18 years old, and live in Moorestown to cast a ballot in the bond referendum. The state provides more details about eligibility. Check your voter registration status by searching the state’s online database.
How do I vote in person?
To vote in person, make sure that you are registered to vote by Feb. 18. Polling locations and times will be posted here once they are finalized.
What if I show up to vote in person and am turned away?
If you show up to your polling station on voting day and are told your ballot was mailed to you, or that you are not able to vote, ask for a provisional ballot. This ensures your ballot will be counted once all mailed ballots are verified and processed.
How do I vote by mail?
If you have already applied to vote by mail, you will receive a ballot in the mail a few weeks before the election.
If you want to vote by mail but haven’t yet signed up, complete and submit a Vote-By-Mail ballot application. The mailed application must arrive at the Burlington County Clerk’s Office no later than March 4 to receive your ballot in the mail.
Voters may apply for a ballot in person at the County Clerk's Office anytime up to 3 p.m. on March 10, the day before the election.
Mail-in ballots must be postmarked by the day of the vote – March 11 – or deposited in a designated drop box by that date. Drop box locations will be posted on this website closer to the election.